Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SmartPhone Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00580 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00580, Dkt. No. 252
Decided
August 2, 2012
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re Claim Construction
Length
60 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,076,275 (“the ‘275 patent”); 7,506,064 (“the ‘064 patent”); 7,533,342 (“the ‘342 patent”); 7,693,949 (“the ‘949 patent”); RE40,459 (“the ‘459 patent”); and 6,950,645 (“the ‘645 patent”). Plaintiff SmartPhone Technologies LLC (“SmartPhone”) alleges that Defendants infringe the1 patents-in-suit. The parties have presented their claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 362, 369 Defendants in Civil Action No.