Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ericsson Inc. et al v. D-Link Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2013)

Granted in Part
JMOL / Post-Trial Infringement Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 615
Decided
August 6, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 528 SEALED PATENT MOTION, GRANTING 527 SEALED PATENT MOTION, DENYING 501 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, DENYING 488 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, DENYING 491 MOTION for Judgment as…
Length
52 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions: Ericsson’s Motion for a Compulsory Future Royalty and Pre -Judgment and Post - Judgment Interest (Docket No. 527); Defendants’ Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Favor of Defendants (Non-Infringement and Invalidit y) and Motion for a New Trial (Docket No. 528); Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Ericsson’s Damages Claims or, in the Alternative, for Vacatur, Remittitur or a New Trial on Damages (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case