Ericsson Inc. et al v. D-Link Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. May 20, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ 1 Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Mr. John R. Bone Regarding Issues Related to Damages (Docket No. 364) (“Motion”). The Court heard oral argument on May 9, 2013. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND This is a standards case. The Plaintiff Ericsson 2 contends its asserted patents cover two features of the IEEE 802.11n standard. Ericsson’s damages expert, John Bone, relied on previous Ericsson 802.11 licenses to determine a per unit royalty for each licen sed product.