Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Sensus USA Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00116 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2010)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00116, Dkt. No. 205
Decided
August 11, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order
Length
68 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,388,101 (“the ‘101 Patent”) and 5,481,546 (“the ‘546 Patent”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Eon Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleges Defendants Sensus USA Inc. (“Sensus”) and Bell Industries, Inc. (“Bell”) (collectively, “Defendants”) infringe the ‘101 and ‘546 Patents. Co-pending before the Court is a related case, EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v.