Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Sensus USA Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00116 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:09-cv-00116, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
January 21, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 88 Motion to Compel; denying 89 Motion to Strike ; denying 90 Motion for Protective Order. The Court Orders EON to supplement its infringement contentions pursuant to this order by 1-29-2010. The Court Orders Sensus to comply …
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Sensus USA Inc.’s (“Sensus”) Motion to Compel Testimony Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6); Alternatively, Sensus’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC’s (“EON”) Infringement Contentions (Doc. Nos. 88, 89) and Sensus’s Motion for Protective Order Against Discovery Related to Its One-Way Water and Gas Meter Products (Doc. No. 90). Both motions are fully briefed (Doc. Nos. 102, 103, 110, 111, 112, 113).