Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al, No. 6:08-cv-00273 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:08-cv-00273, Dkt. No. 128
Decided
February 26, 2010
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING 95 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff Fenner's Infringement Expert Report filed by Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company and Dell, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Sealed Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff Fenner Investments, Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff”) Expert Report (Doc. No. 95). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 99) and Defendants filed a reply (Doc. No. 101). The Court granted Defendants’ unopposed request to substitute certain exhibits (Doc. Nos. 118, 120). Plaintiff made an emergency motion to supplement its briefing with additional exhibits (Doc. No. 116). The Court set an expedited briefing schedule (Doc. No.