Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Honeywell International Inc et al v. Acer America Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 156
Decided
February 5, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 127 Motion to Compel
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Pl aintiff Honeywell International, Inc.’s and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc.’s (collectively “Honeywell”) Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendant CPT, (Doc. No. 127), and Reply in Support, (Doc. No. 133), and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes’ (“CPT”) Response (Doc. No. 129), and Sur-reply, (Doc. No. 134). The Court held a hearing on this Motion on January 29, 2009. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND In this suit, Honeywell asserts that CPT’s products infringe U.S. Patent No.