Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Honeywell International Inc et al v. Acer America Corporation et al, No. 6:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 135
Decided
January 7, 2009
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER interpreting the claim language in this case. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table attached to this opinion as Appendix A
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,041,823 (the “‘823 patent”). In the above-styled cause of action, Plaintiffs Honeywell, Inc. and Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) accuse Defendants Acer America Crop., AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, BenQ America Corp., BenQ USA Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., and Novatek Microelectronics Corp. of infringing claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the ‘823 patent. The parties have submitted a number of claim terms for construction.