Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Accolade Systems LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 6:07-cv-00048 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:07-cv-00048, Dkt. No. 214
Decided
May 29, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court GRANTS IN PART 193 Motion for summary judgment based on the release provision. The Court DENIES as moot Citrix's other grounds for summary judgment. The Court DENIES all other pending motions as moot
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Citrix ’s summary judgmen t motion based on the Settlement and Licensing Agreement (“Agreement”) between Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) and Accolade Systems LLC (“Accolade”) (Docket No. 193) and A ccolade’s motion for leave to conduct additional fact discovery regarding the applicability of the Agreement (Docket No. 211).