Accolade Systems LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al, No. 6:07-cv-00048 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2009)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Claim Construction Opinion interprets the disputed terms in claim 1 of United States Patent No. 7,130,888 (“the ‘888 patent”). Appendix A contains the disputed terms, as they appear in the claims of the ‘888 patent. Appendix B contains a chart summarizing the Court’s constructions and the parties’ agreed constructions. Additionally, the Court DENIES Accolade’s Motion to Reconsider (Docket No. 124) as moot. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Accolade Systems LLC (“Accolade”) accuses Citrix Systems, Inc. (“Citrix”) of infringing c laims of the ‘888 pa tent.