Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00324 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00324, Dkt. No. 336
Decided
February 3, 2009
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 320 Motion for leave to submit a Supplemental Expert Report and Identify an Additional Expert. Buffalo may submit a supplemental expert report but may not identify an additio…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Submit a Supplemental Expert Report and to I dentify an Additional Ex pert (Docket No. 320) . After considering the par ties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES the motion in part. Buffalo may submit a supplemental expert report but may not identify an additional expert.