Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00324 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2006)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Infringement Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103) Written Description
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00324, Dkt. No. 228
Decided
November 13, 2006
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 81 SEALED MOTION filed by Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc, Buffalo Inc, denying 127 SEALED PATENT MOTION for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of the '069 Patent filed by Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc, …
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Docket No. 71), which the Court DENIES; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization’s (“CSIRO”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity (Docket No. 76), which the Court GRANTS; CSIRO’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity (Docket No. 120), which the Court GRANTS; Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity (Docket No. 126), which the Court DENIES; Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case