Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Maxell, Ltd. v. Coretronic Corp. et al, No. 5:24-cv-00088 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:24-cv-00088, Dkt. No. 133
Decided
September 30, 2025
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 97 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that Defendants' objections (Docket No. 104) are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants' Sealed Motion to Dismiss Count 6 of Plaintiffs Com…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Coretronic Corp. and Optoma Corp.’s Objections (Docket No. 104) to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 97). Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. filed a response. Docket No. 106. For the reasons set forth below, the objections (Docket No. 104) are OVER RULED, and the Report (Docket No. 97) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case