Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Maxell, Ltd. v. Coretronic Corp. et al, No. 5:24-cv-00088 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2025)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:24-cv-00088, Dkt. No. 111
Decided
June 30, 2025
Judge
James Boone Baxter, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) alleges infringement by Coretronic Corp. and Optoma Corp. ( to- gether, “Defendants”) of claims from s even patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,159,988 (the “’988 Pa- tent”); 7,850,313 (the “’313 Patent”); 8,593,580 (the “’580 Patent”); 9,322,530 (the “’530 Patent”); 9,547,226 (the “’226 Patent”); 9,565,388 (the “’388 Patent”); and 9,900,569 (the “’569 Patent”) . The parties dispute the scope of eight terms and phrases from four of the s even patents-in-suit (’988, ’580, ’226, and ’388 Patents).