Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arterbury et al v. Odessa Separator, Inc., No. 5:16-cv-00183 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
License / Exhaustion Summary Judgment Motion to Dismiss Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:16-cv-00183, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
February 22, 2019
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 113 Report and Recommendations. 61 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Odessa Separator, Inc. and 57 Sealed Motion to Dismiss filed by Odessa Separator, Inc. are DENIED
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 113), which recommends that the Court deny Defendant Odessa Separator, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 57) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 61). In the underlying motion to dismiss, Defendant argues that Plaintiff Cavins Corporation is not an exclusive licensee of the Patent -in-Suit and, therefore, lacks standing to be a party to this case. Docket No. 57 at 1.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case