Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arterbury et al v. Odessa Separator, Inc., No. 5:16-cv-00183 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Claim Construction Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:16-cv-00183, Dkt. No. 117
Decided
February 12, 2019
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 107 Report and Recommendations. Defendant's 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Invalidity and Non-Infringement is DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Payne ’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 107) recommending the denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 65). Defendant filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation (D ocket No. 115). After considering the briefings and Defendant’s objection, the Court agrees with the conclusions reached by the Magistrate Judge and therefore ADOPTS his recommendation. Defendant only objects to the Magistrate Judge’s refusal to construe a part of independent claim 1.1 See Docket No. 115 at 2–3.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case