Danco, Inc. v. Fluidmaster Inc., No. 5:16-cv-00073 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Fluidmaster, Inc. ’s (“Fluidmaster”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 67). In its Motion, Fluidmaster moves that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), and 28 U.S.C. §1400(b), all claims should be dismissed or transferred because venue is improper in this Court. Having considered the Parties’ submissions and the relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that Fluidmaster’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue should be and hereby is DENIED. I.