Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Danco, Inc. v. Fluidmaster Inc., No. 5:16-cv-00073 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:16-cv-00073, Dkt. No. 111
Decided
September 22, 2017
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re Claim Construction
Length
53 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Danco, Inc.’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 88), Defendant Fluidmaster, Inc.’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 92), Plaintiff Danco, Inc.’s Reply Brief on Claim Construction (Dkt. No. 93), and Defendant Fluidmaster Inc.’s Surreply in Support of its Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 99).1 A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d, 517 U.S. 370 (1996), was held on August 15, 2017.