Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SB IP Holdings LLC v. Vivint, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-00886 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 14, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:20-cv-00886, Dkt. No. 185
Decided
November 14, 2022
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 160 SEALED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Eyetalk365, LLC
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Non -Party Eyetalk 365’ s Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #160). Having considered the motion, the response, and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds the motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff SB IP Holdings LLC (“SB IP”) accuses Vivint, Inc. (“Vivint”) of infringing U.S. Patent Nos.