Plasmacam, Inc. v. Cncelectronics, LLC, et al al, No. 4:19-cv-00037 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2022)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendants CNC Electronics, LLC, Fourhills Designs, LLC, Thomas Lee Caudle, and Martha Jane Caudle’ s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment ( Dkt. #100). On remand of the above -captioned matter from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dkt. #97), the parties filed competing briefs for entry of final judgment (Dkt. #99; Dkt. #100). Having reviewed the briefs, the mandate, and the appl icable law, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Dkt. #100) should be DENIED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error