Plasmacam, Inc. v. Cncelectronics, LLC, et al al, No. 4:19-cv-00037 (E.D. Tex. June 22, 2020)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Pending before the Court are competing motions to enforce settlement: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement (Dkt. #56); and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement or, Alternatively, to Determine that No Settlement Was Reached (Dkt. #57). After reviewing the motions and the relevant pleadings—and holding a status conference on June 5, 2020 regarding these motions—the Court finds that: (1) Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement (Dkt.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error