Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al, No. 4:17-cv-00860 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00860, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
March 26, 2019
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that good cause exists to allow Plaintiff to amend its infringement contentions, and accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Leave (Dkt. 95) …
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (the “Motion for Sanctions”) (Dkt. 90, Sealed) filed on January 25, 2019,1 to which Plaintiff Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a response (Dkt. 96, Sealed), Defendants filed a reply (Dkt. 102), and Plaintiff filed a sur-reply (Dkt. 107). Among other things, Plaintiff’s response (Dkt.