Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al, No. 4:17-cv-00860 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 27, 2018)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00860, Dkt. No. 79
Decided
December 27, 2018
Judge
Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 58) filed by Plaintiff Dynamic Applet Technologies, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Dynamic”), the Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 63) filed by Defendants PetSmart, Inc., Urban Outfitters, Inc., and Hollister Co. (“Defendants”),1 and the Reply Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 65) filed by Plaintiff. Also before the Court is the parties’ August 13, 2018 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt.