Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Actsoft, Inc., No. 4:16-cv-00873 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 4, 2017)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:16-cv-00873, Dkt. No. 58
Decided
October 4, 2017
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court are Plaintiff Orthosie Systems, LLC’ s (“Orthosie’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #48), Defendant Actsoft, Inc.’s (“ Actsoft’s”) Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #54), and Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #55 ). Also before the Court are the parties’ July 6, 2017 Joint Claim Construction Statement Per P.R. 4- 3 (Dkt. #43) and the parties’ September 18, 2017 Joint Claim Construction Statement Per P.R. 4- 5(d) (Dkt. #56).