Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Actsoft, Inc., No. 4:16-cv-00873 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:16-cv-00873, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
September 25, 2017
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Actsoft, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (Dkt. 24) is hereby DENIED
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Actsoft, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. #24). The Court, having considered the relevant pleadings, finds that Defendant’s motion should be denied. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2016, Orthosie Systems, LLC (“Orthosie”) sued Actsoft, Inc. (“Actsoft”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,430,471 (“the ’471 Patent”) (Dkt. #1).