Oasis Research, LLC v. Iron Mountain Inc et al, No. 4:12-cv-00529 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2012)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc.’s Motion for Transfer of Venue to the District of Arizona, or in the Alternative, for Dismissal of Claims Against Go Daddy for Lack of Juri sdiction and Improper Venue (Dkt. #104); (2) Defendant Pro Softnet Corporati on’s Motion to Sever and Transfer Claims Against Pro Softnet to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss (Dkt.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error