Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Freescale Semiconductor Inc v. Promos Technologies, No. 4:06-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2007)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:06-cv-00491, Dkt. No. 85
Decided
December 5, 2007
Judge
Don D. Bush, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER DENYING in most part and GRANTING in part 68 Sealed Motion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. No. 68). The Court has reviewed the Motion and replies. The Court believes a few matters are best reserved for a hearing but that most matters may be disposed of without the necessity of a hearing. The Court notes that Freescale’s Motion is no model of clarity in the relief it seeks. Motions that are overly broad and general should receive the like consideration.