Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. June 12, 2006)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:05-cv-00044, Dkt. No. 203
Decided
June 12, 2006
Judge
Don D. Bush, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 124 SEALED MOTION filed by STMicroelectronics Inc. Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2006
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STMicroelectronics, Inc.(“STM”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgement on Sandisk Corporation’s (“Sandisk”) Four Affirmative Defenses (Docket #124). Having considered the motion and all responsive pleadings, the Court finds as follows. Standard Summary judgment is proper if "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." FED . R. CIV. P. 56(c). The trial court must resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the party opposing the motion.