Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2005)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:05-cv-00044, Dkt. No. 29
Decided
April 27, 2005
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 23 Motion to Change Venue. The Court is of the opinion that the case should remain in the Eastern District of Texas
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before t he C ourt is D efendant’s M otion t o Tra nsfer ( Docket # 23). H aving considered motion, Plaintiff’s response, and Defendant’s reply, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion t o Transfer should be denied. This is a p atent infringement c ase relating t o “ flash m emory” c hips and related products. P laintiff, a D elaw are corpo ration w ith its p rincipal p lace o f b usiness in Carrollton, Texas accuses Defendant, a Delaw are corporation w ith its principal place of business i n S unnyvale, C alifornia, o f i nfringing U. S.