Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

IEX Corporation v. Blue Pumpkin Soft, No. 4:01-cv-00016 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2005)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:01-cv-00016, Dkt. No. 249
Decided
December 14, 2005
Judge
Don D. Bush, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER re 204 Sealed Motion to exclude testimony & opinion of Debbie May, May's testimony as to a reasonable royalty should be excluded as unreliable
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Blue Pumpkin seeks to exclude Plaintiff IEX’s expert, Debbie May’s testimony concerning a reasonable royalty for alleged infringement of IEX’s patent, ( hereinafter referred to the “355 patent”). May is vice president and general manager of IEX. The C ourt notes that her resume addresses her experience in management and development of systems, but is silent as to her financial background.