Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

WAG Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Technius Ltd., No. 2:24-cv-00714 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00714, Dkt. No. 54
Decided
December 23, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds that the Motion (Dkt. No. 38) should be and hereby is DENIED. Additionally, the Court finds that the Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 40) should be and hereby is GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are: (a) the Motion for Protective O rder (the “Motion”) (Dkt. No. 38) filed by Defendant Technius Ltd., d/b/a stripchat.com (“Defendant”); and (b) the Cross-Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (the “Cross-Motion”) (Dkt. No. 40) filed by Plaintiff WAG Acquisition, L.L.C. (“Plaintiff”). Having considered the Motions, their related briefing, and the parties’ oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED and the Cross-Motion should be GRANTED-AS-MODIFIED. I.