Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

WAG Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Technius Ltd., No. 2:24-cv-00714 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00714, Dkt. No. 34
Decided
August 19, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Technius Ltd.. (Motion(s)9 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant Technius Ltd., d/b/a stripchat.com (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 9.) In the Motion, Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff WAG Acquisition , L.L.C.’s (“WAG”) claims for direct infringement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ( Id. at 2.) Having considered the Motion and its related briefing, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. I.