Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Electraled, Inc. v. Astera LED Technology GmbH, No. 2:24-cv-00512 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 29, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00512, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
October 29, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 68 EMERGENCY MOTION for Reconsideration re 67 Memorandum & Opinion,, Terminate Motions, filed by ElectraLED, Inc.. (Motion(s)68 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the “Emergency Motion for Reconsideration” of the grant of transfer, filed by Plaintiff ElectraLED, Inc.. Dkt. No. 68. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND By way of background, on February 14, 2025, Defendants Astera LED Technology GmbH (“Astera Germany ”), Astera Manufacturing Limited (“ Astera China ”), and Astera Distribution Limited (“Astera Hong Kong”) (collectively, “Astera”) filed a motion to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Dkt. No. 29.