Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Electraled, Inc. v. Astera LED Technology GmbH, No. 2:24-cv-00512 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00512, Dkt. No. 64
Decided
September 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 56 Report and Recommendations, 25 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by Astera LED Technology GmbH. (Motion(s)25, 56 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Astera Manufacturing Limited and Astera Distribution Limited previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b) (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 25). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 56) , reco mmending denial of Astera’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisd iction Under Rule 12(b)(2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12(b)(6). Astera has now filed Objections . (Dkt. No. 62).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case