Mullen Industries LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00049 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Sanctions. Dkt. No. 235. The Motion is ripe, Dkt. Nos. 245, 251, and the Court held a hearing on March 6, 2026. The Court finds that the RSA and the MSIA are relevant documents that should have been produced under the Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 29 at 2-3) 1. Furthermore, both documents were repeatedly requested by Plaintiff (e.g., Interrogatory No. 29).