Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mullen Industries LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00049 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00049, Dkt. No. 45
Decided
November 8, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Quash
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Quash the Samsung Defendants’ Venue Deposition Notices to the Extent they Seek Third- Party Confidential Information (the “Motion to Quash”) filed by Plaintiff Mullen Industries LLC (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 41.) Having considered the Motion to Quash and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED- IN- PART and DENIED-IN-PART, as set forth herein. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.