Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Procomm International Pte. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00009 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2026)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00009, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
February 11, 2026
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 156 and 160 Report and Recommendations
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-captioned case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Invalidity Defenses (“Validity Motion”) (Docket No. 104), and Defendants previously filed three motions: a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,724,521 Under Section 101 (“Invalidity Motion”) (Docket No. 102), a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case