Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Procomm International Pte. Ltd. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00009 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00009, Dkt. No. 167
Decided
February 10, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 99 SEALED MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN EXPERT OPINIONS OF MR. JUSTIN BLOK filed by Ericsson, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications, Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Motion(s)99 termin…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike Certain Expert Opinions of Mr. Justin Blok. Dkt. No. 99. The motion is fully briefed . See Dkt. Nos. 116, 125, 138. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the…