Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00640 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) KT Corporation’s (“KT”) Motion for Protective Order from Questioning Beyond the Scope of Jurisdictional Discovery (the “PO Motion,” Dkt. No. 168), and (2) Defendants1 and Intervenors’2 Motion to Compel Court Ordered Deposition of KT Corporation (the “MTC ,” Dkt. No. 169, and with the PO Motion, the “Motions” ). In the PO Motion, KT requests “a protective order seeking relief from non-jurisdictional discovery under FED. R. CIV. P. 26(c)(1), Local Rule CV-26(d), and this Court’s Jurisdictional Discovery Order (Dkt. 148).” (Dkt.