Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00640 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Counterclaim-Defendant KT Corporation’s (“KT”) Motion for Protective Order from Non- Jurisdictional Discovery (the “ PO Motion,” Dkt. No. 150) , and (2) Defendants1 and Intervenors’ 2 Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Requests from Counterclaim-Defendant KT Corporation (the “MTC,” Dkt. No. 151, and with the PO Motion, the “Motions”). In the PO Motion, KT requests “ a protective order seeking relief from non- jurisdictional discovery under F ED. R. CIV. P.