Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00539 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00539, Dkt. No. 373
Decided
April 24, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 362 Over Objections 371
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff SK nexilis Co., Ltd. ( “Plaintiff”) previously filed a Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Craig Arnold (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 147.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 362), denying Plaintiff’s Motion. Plaintiff has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case