Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Asus Technology Licensing Inc. et al v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00486 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2026)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00486, Dkt. No. 885
Decided
July 18, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 579 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION To Strike #1: Motion to Exclude Damages Expert Opinions of David Kennedy. (Motion(s)579 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Damages Expert Opinions of David Kennedy (the “Motion”) . (Dkt. No. 579). The motion is fully briefed . (See Dkt. Nos. 632, 694, 760). The Motion w as orally argued at the pretrial confer ence on July 17, 2026 and granted in part, for the reasons more formally set forth below. Except to the extent granted at the pretrial conference and herein, the Motion is denied. I.