Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Asus Technology Licensing Inc. et al v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00486 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00486, Dkt. No. 393
Decided
March 31, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 377 Report and Recommendations re 102 Motion to Dismiss, filed by ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (Motion(s)102 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ASUS TECHNOLOGY LICENSING INC., et al, Plaintiffs, v. A T&T CORP., et al, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CAS E NO. 2:23-CV-00486-JRG-RSP (Lead Case) O RDER ASUSTeK Computer Inc. previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims Against ASUSTeK (Dkt. No. 102.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No.