Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

WellcomeMat, LLC v. Aylo Holdings S. r.l. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00483 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00483, Dkt. No. 124
Decided
July 29, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Motion(s)103 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Leave to Supplement Infringement Contentions filed by Plaintiff WellcomeMat, LLC. Dkt. No. 103; Dkt. No. 111 (reply in support). Defendants Aylo Holdings S.à r.l., Aylo Freesites Ltd., Aylo Premium Ltd., and 9219- 1568 Quebec, Inc. opposed the Motion through responsive briefing. Dkt. Nos. 104, 114, 118. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “[A] party claiming patent infringement must serve on all parties” infringement contentions. P.R. 3- 1.