Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SportsCastr Inc. v. Sportradar Group, AG, No. 2:23-cv-00472 (E.D. Tex. June 10, 2025)

Denied
Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00472, Dkt. No. 224
Decided
June 10, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 158 MOTION to Strike 127 Sealed Document, Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Antitrust Allegations (Motion(s)158 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Plaintiff ’s Antitrust Allegations (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Genius Sports Ltd., Genius Sports Media Ltd., Genius Sports Technologies Ltd., Genius Sports UK Ltd., Genius Sports Group Ltd., Maven Topco Ltd., Maven Midco Ltd., Maven Debtco Ltd., and Maven Bidco Ltd. (collectively, “Genius”). (Dkt. No. 158). In the Motion, Genius moves pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(f) and 15(a) to strike certain paragraphs in Plaintiff SportsCastr, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case