Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SportsCastr Inc. v. Sportradar Group, AG, No. 2:23-cv-00472 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00472, Dkt. No. 57
Decided
September 17, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 27 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Sportradar Group, AG, Sportradar AG. (Motion(s)27 terminated)
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Sportradar Group AG (“Sportradar Group”) and Sportradar AG’s (“Sportradar AG” ) (collectively, the “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss , and, in the Alternative, to Transfer (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 27.) In their Motion, Defendants move this Court to dismiss Plaintiff Sportcastr, Inc.’s (d/b/a PANDA Interactive) (“PANDA”) Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), or, in the alternative, to transfer to the District of Delaware under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).