Anonymous Media Research Holdings LLC v Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 17, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude the Apportionment-Related Opinions of Mr. W. Leo Hoarty. Dkt. No. 132. In the Motion, Samsung asks the Court to exclude apportionment-related opinions of Plaintiff’s technical benefits expert, Mr. Hoarty, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The Parties have fully briefed the Motion. Dkt. Nos. 147, 167, 176. The Motion is DENIED for the following reasons. I.