Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Anonymous Media Research Holdings LLC v Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00439 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00439, Dkt. No. 239
Decided
September 16, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 128 Sealed Motion to Strike
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Samsung’s Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Dr. Sam Malek Regarding Dependent Claims. Dkt. No. 128. The Parties have fully briefed the Motion. Dkt. Nos. 146, 165, 174. For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient fac…