Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Quash Service and Dismiss the Complaint 1 or in the Alternative Transfer Venue (Dkt. No. 75 ). After consideration, the Court concludes that Alkem has not met its burden of showing that the District of Delaware would be a clearly more convenient venue than this forum. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Alkem’s Motion to Transfer. I. APPLICABLE LAW A federal district court may transfer a case “for the convenience of parties and witnesses” to “any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C.