Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Greenthread, LLC v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00212 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00212, Dkt. No. 112
Decided
May 1, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 85 OPPOSED MOTION to Compel Compliance with P.R. 3-1 and Strike Uncharted Products filed by OmniVision Technologies, Inc., 94 OPPOSED MOTION to Compel Defendant OmniVision Technologies Inc. to Remove Improper…
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two related discovery motions in Lead Case No. 2:23-cv-212. First is Defendant OmniVision Technologies Inc.’s (“OmniVision”) Motion to Compel Greenthread’s Compliance with P.R. 3-1 and Strike Uncharted Products (the “Motion to Strike”). (Dkt. No. 85.) Having considered the Motion to Strike and the subsequent briefing, the Court finds that the Motion to Strike should be DENIED. Second is Plaintiff Greenthread, LLC’s (“Greenthread”) Motion to Compel OmniVision to Remove Improper Confidential Designations ( the “Motion to Compel”).